CIRILO P. TIRADO, SR. AND EDNA S. CASIPLE, COMPLAINANTS, vs. . YANENA D. PORTILLANO, CLERK OF COURT II, 3 RD MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT, BAGUMBAYAN-ESPERANZA, SULTAN KUDARAT.

  • G.R. Number: A.M. No. 07-5-140-
  • Promulgated: 2021-07-27

Keywords

Rule 140 Revised Rules of Court Section 22, Rule 140 Revised Rules of Court Section 25(A) paragraph 1, 1999 Uniform Rules on Administrative Cases in the Civil Service Section 52(A)(2), resignation not a bar to administrative liability, failure to remit court funds tantamount to gross neglect of duty, dishonesty and grave misconduct, administrative case, misconduct ofpekt court personnel, accountability of court funds, cash bail bond, fiduciary funds, dishonesty, grave misconduct, gross neglect of duty, prima facie evidence, malversation of public funds, accessory penalties, civil service eligibility, forfeiture of benefits, respondent found guilty, penalty of dismissal can no longer be imposed due to resignation

Read the full decision on LexiQuire