HAZEL MA. C. ANTOLIN-ROSERO, PETITIONER, VS. PROFESSIONAL REGULATION COMMISSION, BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY, AND ABELARDO T. DOMONDON, REYNALDO D. GAMBOA, JOSE A. GANGAN, VIOLETA J. JOSEF, JOSE V. RAMOS, AND ANTONIETA FORTUNA-IBE RESPONDENTS.

  • G.R. Number: G.R. No. 220378
  • Promulgated: 2021-06-30

Keywords

Rule 45 Rules of Court, Section 36 Article III Rules and Regulations Governing the Regulation and Practice of Professionals, Section 20 PRC Resolution No. 338, Section 3 Rule 65 Rules of Court, Section 7 Article III 1987 Constitution, Section 28 Article II 1987 Constitution, Section 5(e) RA 6713, Section 7(c) RA 6713, Section 3 Rule IV IRR of Civil Service Commission on RA 6713, PD 223, Section 5 PD 223, Executive Order No. 200 Series of 1994, Section 14 PRC Resolution No. 338, PRC Resolution No. 265, Right to Information is not absolute, Mandamus will not lie to compel disclosure of confidential information, Right to Information, Licensure Examination, Professional Regulation Commission, Accountancy Licensure Examinations

Read the full decision on LexiQuire