OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, PETITIONER, VS. MIROFE C. FRONDA AND FLORENDO B. ARIAS, RESPONDENTS.
- G.R. Number: G.R. No. 211239
- Promulgated: 2021-04-26
Keywords
Rule 45 Rules of Court, RA 6770 Section 15(3) (Ombudsman Act of 1989), Republic Act 9184, RA 6713 Sections 4(a), (c) and 7(a), CSC Resolution No. 06-0533 Section 3, Section 50(A) Rule 10, 2017 Rules on Administrative Cases in the Civil Service, Sections 22 and 23, Rule XIV, Omnibus Rules Implementing Book V of Executive Order No. 292, DPWH Department Order No. 33, Series of 1988, Arias v. Sandiganbayan doctrine, distinction between dishonesty and negligence, administrative liability of public officers, government fraud, procurement fraud, serious dishonesty, gross neglect of duty, Preponderance of Evidence, Substantial Evidence, Certiorari, serous dishonesty, simple neglect of duty