ROGELIM A. CABRALES AND NOE CABRIDO GOZALO, PETITIONERS , VS. THE OMBUDSMAN, NAHUM E. DOSDOS, PASCUAL R. PONGASE II, AND RAUL P. LLAGAS, *** RESPONDENTS .

  • G.R. Number: G.R. No. 254125
  • Promulgated: 2022-10-12
  • Ponente: GAERLAN, J.

Keywords

Rule 45 Rules of Court, Rule 43 Rules of Court, Section 3(e) Republic Act No. 3019, Republic Act No. 9184 Sections 11 and 12, Section 18 Republic Act No. 9184, Section 21.2.1(a) 2009 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations Part A Republic Act No. 9184, Section 8.3.1 Rule II 2009 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations Republic Act No. 9184, Section 20.1 Rule VII 2009 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations Republic Act No. 9184, Section 23.2 Rule VIII 2009 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations Republic Act No. 9184, Sections 30.1 & 30.2 Rule IX 2009 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations Republic Act No. 9184, Sections 34.3-34.7 Rule X 2009 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations Republic Act No. 9184, Section 11.2.4 Rule V 2009 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations Republic Act No. 9184, Section 31 Corporation Code, Condonation Doctrine, Stare Decisis, Res Judicata, Government Procurement, Administrative Liability, Public Officers Misconduct, Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) irregularities

Read the full decision on LexiQuire