PETER Q. MARISTELA, PETITIONER, VS. JOSE MARIA M. MIRASOL, RESPONDENT. LOPEZ, J., J.: The offense that petitioner is being held liable for is Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service, which consists of any act that would tarnish the image and integrity of his public office. As a City…
- G.R. Number: G.R. No. 241074
- Promulgated: 2022-08-22
- Ponente: LOPEZ, J.
Keywords
Republic Act No. 3019 Section 3, Republic Act No. 6713 Section 4(c), Rule 43 Rules of Court, Revised Penal Code Article 212, Civil Code Articles 1411 and 1412, in pari delicto, factual findings of the Office of the Ombudsman are conclusive, Administrative Liability, Graft and Corruption, Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service, Petition for Review on Certiorari, Substantial Evidence, Preponderance of Evidence, Affidavit-testimony, Probable Cause, Quantum of Proof, Burden of Proof, Administrative Offense, Petition denied, Decision affirmed