NEMIA T. MAGALUNA, ANECIA C. PORE, EDELYN D. ESPEJON, HERMES P. FORCADILLA, EUTIQUIO C. PALER, CHARLITO B. PLAZA AND GLENDALE F. ESCATRON, PETITIONERS, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN (MINDANAO), REPRESENTED BY HON. RODOLFO M. ELMAN, DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN FOR MINDANAO, HON. MARCO ANACLETO P. BUENA,…
- G.R. Number: G.R. No. 214747
- Promulgated: 2022-07-18
- Ponente: KHO JR., J.
Keywords
Article 171 paragraph 4 Revised Penal Code, Section 16 Article III 1987 Constitution, Section 4 Rule II Ombudsman Administrative Order No. 7, Section 3 Rule V Ombudsman Administrative Order No. 7, Section 3 Rule 112 Rules of Court, Cagang v. Sandiganbayan, Tatad v. Sandiganbayan, Falsification of Official Documents, Right to Speedy Disposition of Cases, Preliminary Investigation by Ombudsman, Probable Cause, Certiorari, Counter-Affidavit, Affidavit of Desistance, Subpoena Duces Tecum, Inordinate Delay, Laches, Grave Abuse of Discretion, Petition partially granted, Resolution annulled and set aside for one petitioner