However, in the Decision [14] dated April 6, 2022, in People of the Philippines vs. . Enojo , docketed as G.R. No. 252258, the Court acquitted on the ground of reasonable doubt. The Court ruled that there is no adequate proof that persuaded or influenced the police into sending a request for…
- G.R. Number: G.R. No. 252258
- Promulgated: 2023-11-29
- Ponente: INTING, J.
Keywords
Section 3(a) Republic Act No. 3019, Rule 1.01 Code of Professional Responsibility, Rule 6.02 Code of Professional Responsibility, Section 1 Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability, Section 30 Canon II Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability, Section 33 Canon VI Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability, Section 37 Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability, Section 38 Canon VI Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability, Section 39 Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability, Section 40 Canon VI Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability, Presumption of innocence, Burden of proof in administrative cases, Disbarment, Gross Misconduct, Lawyers in government service, Conflict of interest, Substantial evidence, Administrative liability, Grave Misconduct, Aggravating circumstances