Additionally, the Court noted that was found administratively liable in two earlier cases. In Pineda vs. . Pinto [11] ( Pineda ), the Court reprimanded for charges of gross inefficiency and neglect of duty. In Marcos v. Pinto [12] ( Marcos ), she was also found liable of simple misconduct for which…
- G.R. Number: A.M. No. 02-11-10-
- Promulgated: 2023-03-08
- Ponente: CAGUIOA, J.
Keywords
Section 24, Rule 119 of the 2000 Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, Republic Act No. 9946, Doctrine of Finality of Judgments, Judicial Clemency, Gross Ignorance of the Law, Gross Misconduct, Dishonesty, Retirement Benefits Forfeiture, Administrative Liability of Judges, Final and Executory Judgment, Prima Facie, Clear and Convincing Evidence, Preponderance of Evidence, Certifications, Testimonials, Humanitarian Reasons, Reformation, Remorse, Fact-finding Check, Judicial Audit