PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. NICASIO M. PEÑA AND CAMACHO L. CHIONG, ACCUSED-APPELLANTS. G.R. No. 250685 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. EUGENIO L. FAMOR, ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

  • G.R. Number: G.R. No. 248710
  • Promulgated: 2023-03-29
  • Ponente: INTING, J.

Keywords

Section 3(e) Republic Act No. 3019, Republic Act No. 8973, Republic Act No. 7160 Section 325, Republic Act No. 7041, 1987 Constitution Article IX-B Section 2(2), Administrative Code of 1987 Chapter 5, Title I-A, Book V, Section 21(1), Administrative Code of 1987 Chapter 8, Title I-A, Book V, Section 59, Local Government Code of 1991 Article 165, Local Government Code of 1991 Section 80, Local Government Code of 1991 Section 466(2), CSC Memorandum Circular No. 40, Series of 1998, CSC Memorandum Circular No. 3, Series of 2001, 1998 CSC Omnibus Rules on Appointments Rule VI Section 3, 1998 CSC Omnibus Rules on Appointments Rule VI Section 4, 1998 CSC Omnibus Rules on Appointments Rule VI Section 5, 1998 CSC Omnibus Rules on Appointments Rule VII Section 1(a), 1998 CSC Omnibus Rules on Appointments Rule VII Section 1(c), Presumption of Innocence, Penal laws are construed liberally in favor of the accused and strictly against the state, Administrative Law Doctrine (CSC cannot amend the law it seeks to implement)

Read the full decision on LexiQuire