PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON GOOD GOVERNMENT, PETITIONER, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, ROBERTO V. ONGPIN, GERARDO AGULTO, JR., DOMINGO INGCO, BERNARDO M. VERGARA, FEDERICO SALCEDO AND MERLE JEAN O. DEEN, RESPONDENTS.

  • G.R. Number: G.R. No. 212269
  • Promulgated: 2023-01-17
  • Ponente: HERNANDO, J.

Keywords

Section 3(e) and (g) Republic Act No. 3019, Rule 65 Rules of Court, Section 11 Republic Act No. 3019, Presidential Decree No. 564, Principle of non-interference with the investigatory and prosecutorial powers of the Ombudsman, Grave abuse of discretion, Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, Behest Loans, Criminal Investigation, Probable Cause Determination, Certiorari, Grave Abuse of Discretion, Probable Cause, Manifest Partiality, Evident Bad Faith, Gross Inexcusable Negligence, Prescriptive Period, Hearsay, Best Evidence Rule, Prejudicial Question

Read the full decision on LexiQuire