Remedial Law, Legal and Judicial Ethics, with Practical Exercises › Evidence › Weight and Sufficiency (Rule 133)

3. Competent and Credible Evidence

COMPETENT AND CREDIBLE EVIDENCE

COMPETENT EVIDENCE CREDIBLE EVIDENCE
Evidence that is not excluded by the Rules, statutes or Constitution. When evidence is not only admissible evidence but is believable and used by the court in deciding a case.
"A witness who testifies in a categorical, straightforward, spontaneous and frank manner and remains consistent is a credible witness” (Vda. de Arago v. Alvarez, March 25, 1997, 337 PHIL 108- 121)

NOTE: that Rule 24, Administrative Order No. 1, series of 1993 only provides for sanctions against persons violating the rule on confidentiality of birth records, but nowhere does it state that procurement of birth records in violation of said rule would render said records inadmissible in evidence. On the other hand, the Revised Rules of Evidence only provides for the exclusion of evidence if it is obtained as a result of illegal searches and seizures. It should be emphasized, however, that said rule against unreasonable searches and seizures is meant only to protect a person from interference by the government or the state.

Since both Rule 24, Administrative Order No. 1, series of 1993 and the Revised Rules on Evidence do not provide for the exclusion from evidence of the birth certificates in question, said public documents are, therefore, admissible and should be properly taken into consideration in the resolution of this administrative case against respondent. (Tolentino v. Mendoza, A.C. No. 5151 (Resolution), 2004).

> RULE 129 WHAT NEED NOT BE PROVED Section 1. Judicial notice, when mandatory. – A court shall take judicial notice, without the introduction of evidence, of the existence and territorial extent of states, their political history, forms of government and symbols of nationality, the law of nations, the admiralty and maritime courts of the world and their seals, the political constitution and history of the Philippines, official acts of the legislative, executive and judicial departments of the National Government of the Philippines, the laws of nature, the measure of time, and the geographical divisions. (1a) Section 2. Judicial notice, when discretionary. – A court may take judicial notice of matters which are of public knowledge, or are capable of unquestionable demonstration, or ought to be known to judges because of their judicial functions. (2) Section 3. Judicial notice, when hearing necessary. – During the pre-trial and the trial, the court, motu proprio or upon motion, shall hear the parties on the propriety of taking judicial notice of any matter. Before judgment or on appeal, the court, motu proprio or upon motion, may take judicial notice of any matter and shall hear the parties thereon if such matter is decisive of a material issue in the case. (3a)

Authorities

  • Administrative Order No. 1, series of 1993, Sec. 24
  • Revised Rules of Evidence
  • Revised Rules on Evidence
  • Rule 129 (What Need Not Be Proved), Sec. 1
  • Rule 129 (What Need Not Be Proved), Sec. 2
  • Rule 129 (What Need Not Be Proved), Sec. 3
  • Tolentino v. Mendoza, A.C. No. 5151, 19 October 2004
  • Vda. De Arago v. Judge Paterno T. Alvarez, 25 March 1997