Civil Law and Land Titles and Deeds › Special Contracts › Credit Transactions › Guaranty and Suretyship

d. Legal and Judicial Bonds

Legal and Judicial Bonds

Concept

A bond may be a suretyship undertaking when a surety guarantees the performance of a principal or obligor in favor of an obligee. The statutory definition includes official recognizances, stipulations, bonds, and undertakings issued by a company under the laws identified in the provision. Thus, the word “bond” alone does not settle the surety’s liability; the undertaking and its terms must be examined. (Sec. 175, Pres. Decree No. 612)1 (Sec. 176, Pres. Decree No. 612)2

Governing provisions

  • Under Section 175 of Presidential Decree No. 612, suretyship guarantees another party’s performance of an obligation or undertaking. Its coverage expressly includes certain official recognizances and bonds. (Sec. 175, Pres. Decree No. 612)1
  • Under Section 176, the surety’s liability is joint and several with the obligor, limited to the bond amount, and determined strictly by the suretyship contract in relation to the principal contract. (Sec. 176, Pres. Decree No. 612)2
  • For corporate bail, Rule 114, Section 10 permits a domestic or foreign corporation licensed as a surety and currently authorized to act as such to provide bail through a bond jointly subscribed by the accused and a corporate officer duly authorized by its board. (Rule 114, Sec. 10, Rules of Court)3

Requisites / Rules

  • Identify the principal undertaking, the obligation guaranteed by the bond, and the bond’s stated amount. Joint and several liability does not dispense with the statutory limit of the bond amount or the need to read the suretyship terms alongside the principal contract. (Sec. 175, Pres. Decree No. 612)1 (Sec. 176, Pres. Decree No. 612)2
  • For a corporate bail bond, check both the corporation’s current authority to act as a licensed surety and the subscribing officer’s board authorization. The accused must also subscribe the bond jointly with that officer. (Rule 114, Sec. 10, Rules of Court)3

Distinctions

A guaranty must be express and cannot extend beyond what is stipulated. By contrast, the cited suretyship provision makes the surety jointly and severally liable with the obligor, subject to the bond amount and the governing contracts. The distinction matters when determining whether the creditor may enforce the promised performance against the surety. (Art. 2055, Civil Code)4 (Sec. 176, Pres. Decree No. 612)2

Key doctrines

  • A surety whose bond incorporates a contract and guarantees its undertakings is liable for the obligations covered by the bond. Its liability is not reduced to a proportional share without a contractual or legal basis. (FGU Insurance Corporation v. Spouses Roxas, G.R. No. 189526, 9 August 2017)5
  • Whether surety liability requires a written principal agreement depends on the surety contract itself; that contract may make submission of a written principal agreement a condition of liability. (Cellpage International Corporation v. Solid Guaranty, Inc., G.R. No. 226731, 17 June 2020)6
  • A paying surety may invoke the rights of indemnification and subrogation granted to guarantors. Indemnity may include the debt, applicable interest, qualifying expenses, and damages if due; subrogation transfers the creditor’s rights against the debtor, but a compromise does not allow recovery beyond what was actually paid. (FGU Insurance Corporation v. Spouses Roxas)5 (Art. 2066, Civil Code)7 (Art. 2067, Civil Code)8

Exceptions

The surety contract may affect defenses based on the creditor’s conduct: an express stipulation may bind the surety despite permitted acts or omissions, while, absent such a stipulation, negligent conduct or a material alteration may discharge the surety. The agreement’s wording is therefore critical. (Carodan v. China Banking Corporation, G.R. No. 210542, 24 February 2016)9

Bar tip

In a bond problem, begin with the bond’s terms, the guaranteed undertaking, and the bond amount. If it is corporate bail, separately verify the surety corporation’s authority and the officer’s board authorization. (Sec. 176, Pres. Decree No. 612)2 (Rule 114, Sec. 10, Rules of Court)3

Authorities

  • Art. 2055, Civil Code
  • Art. 2066, Civil Code
  • Art. 2067, Civil Code
  • Carodan v. Corporation, G.R. No. 210542, 24 February 2016
  • Corporation v. Spouses Roxas, G.R. No. 189526, 9 August 2017
  • Corporation v. The Solid Guaranty, Inc., G.R. No. 226731, 17 June 2020
  • Rule 114, Sec. 10, Rules of Court
  • Sec. 175, Pres. Decree No. 612
  • Sec. 176, Pres. Decree No. 612