Labor Law and Social Legislation › Labor Adjudication › Labor Agencies › National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC)

b. Commission Proper (See also RA 9347)

COMMISSION PROPER

Concept

The Commission Proper is the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), as distinguished from its regional branches. It is attached to the Department of Labor and Employment solely for program and policy coordination. It may sit en banc or in eight divisions, each composed of three members. (Art. 213, Labor Code)1

Governing provisions

Article 213 governs the Commission’s composition and manner of sitting. Article 218 states its powers, while Article 223 governs appeals from decisions, awards, or orders of Labor Arbiters. The supplied provision amending Article 215 addresses the qualifications, tenure, and appointment of Commissioners. (Art. 213, Labor Code)1 (Art. 218, Labor Code)2 (Art. 223, Labor Code)3 (Labor Code (amending Art. 215))4

Requisites / Rules

  • Composition. The NLRC consists of a Chairman and 23 members. Eight members each are chosen only from nominees of workers’ and employers’ organizations; the Chairman and seven remaining members come from the public sector. Members nominated by workers’ or employers’ organizations must divest themselves, upon assuming office, of any affiliation with or interest in the federation or association to which they belong. (Art. 213, Labor Code)1
  • Qualifications and appointment. The Chairman and Commissioners must be Philippine Bar members with at least 15 years of law practice in the Philippines and at least five years of experience or exposure in labor-management relations. They are appointed by the President; an appointment to a vacancy in a specific division must come from nominees of the sector that nominated the predecessor. (Labor Code (amending Art. 215))4
  • Appeal period and grounds. A Labor Arbiter’s decision, award, or order becomes final and executory unless either or both parties appeal to the Commission within ten calendar days from receipt. An appeal may be entertained only on the grounds stated in Article 223: prima facie abuse of discretion; fraud or coercion, including graft and corruption; purely legal questions; or serious factual errors causing grave or irreparable damage or injury. (Art. 223, Labor Code)3

Distinctions

The Commission may act en banc or through divisions, but Article 213 limits its en banc sitting to promulgating rules and regulations governing the hearing and disposition of cases before its divisions and regional branches and formulating policies affecting its administration and operations; it exercises its adjudicatory powers through its divisions. Its authority to issue rules is distinct from its authority under Article 218 to administer oaths, summon parties, issue subpoenas, and conduct investigations within its jurisdiction. (Art. 213, Labor Code)1 (Art. 218, Labor Code)2

Key doctrines

Failure to appeal a Labor Arbiter’s monetary award within the reglementary period makes it final and executory as to the nonappealing employer, which may no longer assail components of that award. More generally, a final judgment may not be altered or modified once final, especially after it has been executed and fully satisfied. (Osm Maritime Services, Inc. v. Go, G.R. No. 238128, 20 February 2023)5 (Tan v. Dagpin, G.R. No. 212111, 15 January 2020)6

Exceptions

For a judgment involving a monetary award, an employer may perfect an appeal only by posting the cash or accredited surety bond required by Article 223 in an amount equivalent to the monetary award. An appeal does not suspend the immediately executory reinstatement aspect of a Labor Arbiter’s decision, and the employer’s bond does not stay its execution. (Art. 223, Labor Code)3

Bar tip

Identify the Commission’s role before discussing an appeal: check the ten-calendar-day period, the stated ground, any required employer bond, and whether reinstatement must proceed pending appeal. (Art. 223, Labor Code)3

Authorities

  • Art. 213, Labor Code
  • Art. 218, Labor Code
  • Art. 223, Labor Code
  • Investor v. Dagpin, G.R. No. 212111, 15 January 2020
  • Labor Code (amending Art. 215)
  • Services v. Go, G.R. No. 238128, 20 February 2023